or was that, in fact, the best story you could tell for the obama administration? that's what i want to know about the part she played. and i also would like to know why was she chosen? she has absolutely no responsibility for the benghazi conflict. she was not an intelligence professional. and can the president said -- and the president said why pick on her? she doesn't know anything about benghazi, she had nothing to do it. so my question is, why was she speaking to the american people then? gregg: sure. well, she claims she was relying on these classified albeit incorrect talking points that were given to her by the intel agencies, but she did have clearance and access to the classified swell -- intel that said it was, in fact, a terrorist attack. do you think she had a duty to look at that before she ever spoke authoritatively on the subject? >> yes, unequivocally. you're explaining to the american people a massive national security breakdown, the first ambassador killed in the line of duty in over 30 years, a situation that was a long time in the making. and t